Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘Apple’

Publishers Take Note | From some perspectives, we are tipping right now and publishers’ metrics will show it – The Shatzkin Files

Mike Shatzkin talks about the impressive/scary growth of ebooks in the US market:

Michael Cader of Publishers Lunch reported you have to subscribe to use the links that BookScan numbers show a drop in unit sales of printed books of 4.4 % from 2009 to 2010.

But don’t take that number to any bank. It is already out of date. Cader did a further analysis of more recent BookScan data shortly thereafter showing that print book sales have dropped by over 15% compared to the prior year over the first six weeks of 2011! And the share of print sold online keeps rising, so that almost certainly means that print sales in stores has fallen even faster. Could print sales in stores have dropped 20% or 25% from a year ago? They certainly could!

Sales of iPads, Kindles, and Nooks exceeded most expectations for Christmas 2010. Dominique Raccah, the head of independent publisher Sourcebook, a company with a diverse trade list, reported on her blog that dollar sales at her company in January were 35% digital!

via From some perspectives, we are tipping right now and publishers’ metrics will show it – The Shatzkin Files.

Publishers Take Note | Apple to Tighten Control of How Magazines, Content Are Sold for iPad – WSJ.com

The recent decision by Apple to reject Sony’s eReader app seems to have opened up a much larger and far more wide-ranging debate about in-App and non-iTunes purchases.

Amazon’s Kindle App sends readers to their buying system in Safari to avoid paying Apple’s toll (30%) but recent suggestions are that Apple are intent on stopping that and enforcing either full in-app purchases or at the very least offering in-app purchase as an option.

It brings to mind for me the need for publishers to have their own web strategy and not to become reliant on the platforms of others whose goals and plans are in no way aligned with theirs:

Apple has indicated the sales outside of iTunes can continue, as long as sales through its store are provided as an option. “Rest assured that we want our customers to be able to get their publications easily both from our App Store and obviously from websites or other ways they get them,” Mr. Cue said.V

Apple is tightening enforcement of a rule governing how some apps for the iPad must handle sales, a shift that affects online books as well as other electronic publications. Above, a customer looks at the Angry Birds game on an Apple Inc. iPad tablet computer at the Simply Mac store Salt Lake City, Utah.Apple hasnt disclosed details of terms it is offering publishers, but generally takes a 30% cut on such iTunes transactions. News Corp, which also publishes The Wall Street Journal, appears to be getting a similar deal for The Daily, which Apple helped develop. Rupert Murdoch, its chairman, said in an interview Wednesday on the Fox Business Network that his company is getting 70 cents of every dollar for the first year, with Apple getting 30 cents. He said the terms after that were subject to negotiation.

via Apple to Tighten Control of How Magazines, Content Are Sold for iPad – WSJ.com.

The Differential Rates Of Digital Change Problem

There’s an issue I’ve been exploring on this blog and elsewhere for some time. It’s about digital change and what it does to large and small markets, especially when the rates of change in these markets differ. I’ve called it the differential rates of digital change problem and I think it is time I put a solid definition on it.

So here it goes. The Differential Rates Of Digital Change Problem occurs:

When a large publishing market undergoes a more rapid shift towards digital delivery and consumption of books than a smaller publishing market.

This change has many significant implications but the three I want to focus on here are:

  • Rights pressure on small market publishers
  • Sales pressure on small market publishers
  • Growing disparity between ACTUAL digital change in small markets and OBSERVABLE digital change

Let’s look at these one by one.

Rights Pressure
I’ve highlighted how larger market publishers increasingly have an incentive to acquire global digital rights in works, whereas, as of yet, smaller market publishers have little incentive to hold on to those rights, though they know that in the future they will need them. I’ve pointed to one possible way to meet both needs here.

Sales Pressure
This is almost a bigger deal for small markets. And it has a few forms.

  1. Digital sales of titles not necessarily available in the smaller market to customers in the smaller market recorded as sales in larger markets (eg Kindle Sales to Irish customers via Amazon.com or .co.uk)
  2. Digital sales of titles available in smaller markets physically AND digitally but made through sites that record those sales in the larger market (eg titles published by local publishers or foreign publishers available on Amazon.com Kindle store)
  3. And of course, if a small market publisher sells global digital rights to a book they publish, then the digital editions of locally published books will sell through the larger market
  4. The quietest form is of course digital sales to residents who have retailer accounts in other territories, ie English Address for Amazon.co.uk Kindle sales (small I’d wager but without the stats who knows)

These sales are starting, slowly but surely, to leak sales from small markets to large markets. The levels are unquantifiable right now in anything but the most sketchy way, but they are surely growing with each Kindle,  Kobo reader, iPad, iPod Touch, iPhone and Android device sold into a small market. The proliferation of devices offering ebooks sold through large market retailers  MUST be driving sales from those markets. When those retailers start sharing their data (and how likely is that) we will know for sure.

Over time the sales impact will become pronounced, especially if the small markets don’t develop a local infrastructure for selling ebooks. Imagine for instance if all digital sales in Ireland were made through Amazon, Apple, Google and Kobo with maybe a small share for the rest? If the system remains as now, no digital sales will ever be recorded and the market for books will shrink dramatically OR at least  it will seem to.

Actual Vs Observable Data
This is a bigger issue than it sounds like and is deeply relevant. As digital change moves on, small markets get a false idea of how rapidly their market is shifting, or at least publishers native to that small market do. If sales are happening in the estores I’ve already highlighted then the local market doesn’t see them. If 20% of the market shifts to digital, but buys its books from foreign retailers, then the market will fall by 20% and it would still look like digital has no presence.

Clearly there are offsets here. For instance, if a local publisher starts putting their titles on those outlets they will start selling books and will realize that the digital shift is ALREADY happening, or perhaps they will realize that even if it isn’t happening, they can sell some of their books to a global customer base.

What’s more, local offices of large publishers (quite a few of which exist in Ireland) will be able to see their rising ebook sales through their corporate parents and will know well enough how quickly digital sales are growing.

But even so, the data for the smaller market as a whole will be fractured and patchy, controlled by outside forces whose good will cannot be relied on and all the time digital will seem, because there is little reliable evidence to the contrary, to be a marginal market.

In this strange  scenario, local publishers remain unwilling to invest in digital because they feel the market is small but equally the market to them remains small because they have not even invested to get a few titles digitized and for sale on these foreign platforms. The only way to see beyond the apparently tiny size of the market is to take the leap and invest a small amount, but companies, in the absence of data, are rightly reluctant to do so.

Conclusion
So there it is, the Differential Rates Of Digital Change Problem. It’s not a problem for larger publishing markets of course and I don’t see any real way of addressing it until figures for digital sales begin to be shared more freely by the large companies like Apple, Amazon and Google who are not really minded to share it.

The only way beyond it is to accept on faith that digital is growing in smaller markets but in hidden ways, then to step beyond that and start offering your products digitally. This doesn’t have to be a huge investment (and if you doubt that, spend some time online reading about ebook creation from text files) but it does need to happen and it needs to happen soon.

Digital Change | MediaPost Publications iDiots Guide To Publishing On The iPad 01/13/2011

Print publishers are screwing up what could be their biggest opportunity. Many continue to botch their Web strategy, and are now doubling down by getting their iPad strategy completely wrong.The core of the problem lies in how publishers think about the iPad. Just look at the headlines: “Will the iPad save print?” asks one; “Savior crucified” proclaims another.

via MediaPost Publications iDiots Guide To Publishing On The iPad 01/13/2011.

Publishers, Build Digital Audience | Exact Editions: The iPad App Market for Magazines

Adam Hodgkin, at Exact Editions, one of the smartest heads in the business has been working in a much less dramatic way then the BIG consumer magazines, to move clients towards a digital strategy on the Apple iTunes (and other) platform. he has an interesting post today about that experience that’s WELL worth reading in full.

But this wouldn’t be a GLM link if I didn’t highlight ONE passage, so here it is:

One of the key things about the iPad is that it has given publishers a good reason to re-engage their existing audience in the concept of digital access. We think that this is the really, really good news about the iPad. Digital subscriptions for your existing audience are a key part of the reason for embracing the iPad. The point is that a magazine publisher can quickly and efficiently convert his print audience to a digital audience at low cost using free access to the digital feed as a reward for print subscribers. That way the circulation of the print audience is confirmed and strengthened and at the same time a new digital only audience can be won. Because the publisher sells digital access (via iTunes or directly) to those customers who do not want to buy the print service.

via Exact Editions: The iPad App Market for Magazines.